Comments from Tito...
I usually don't post my thoughts on a site like this, but I figured, why not? Maybe I'll get some interesting comments, and, maybe not. I'm curious about a recent Quick Vote posted by CNN.com on its website. (If you'd like to see the article go to:
http://www.cnn.com/2005/TECH/science/02/17/global
.warming.reut/index.html)
However you feel about global warming makes no difference to me, and if you want to know how I feel, please post a comment and ask. Anyways, the question posed was this: Do you agree with climate experts that golabl warming is well under way? The available answers: Yes or No. Do you think CNN may actually post the results of this question at some point in time? And if they do what will it mean? What if no living person with access to CNN.com who stumbled upon this article felt that global warming was indeed a reality? Would this collective perception mean that global warming is indeed a farce? If JP had decided to answer "No" and the results came back 63% - 37% in his favor, would this validate his poor soul in some way? And if he was on the losing side should I worry about his emotional well-being?
As you can see, I have a lot of questions because of this particular Quick Vote question. Is CNN attempting to tap the collective conscience of humanity, in some heroic attempt to alter the flow of enerfy through the universe to save our beautiful planet. I'd enjoy to read any of your responses as to what you feel the purpose of this Quick Vote question is (or any for that matter). - Tito
http://www.cnn.com/2005/TECH/science/02/17/global
.warming.reut/index.html)
However you feel about global warming makes no difference to me, and if you want to know how I feel, please post a comment and ask. Anyways, the question posed was this: Do you agree with climate experts that golabl warming is well under way? The available answers: Yes or No. Do you think CNN may actually post the results of this question at some point in time? And if they do what will it mean? What if no living person with access to CNN.com who stumbled upon this article felt that global warming was indeed a reality? Would this collective perception mean that global warming is indeed a farce? If JP had decided to answer "No" and the results came back 63% - 37% in his favor, would this validate his poor soul in some way? And if he was on the losing side should I worry about his emotional well-being?
As you can see, I have a lot of questions because of this particular Quick Vote question. Is CNN attempting to tap the collective conscience of humanity, in some heroic attempt to alter the flow of enerfy through the universe to save our beautiful planet. I'd enjoy to read any of your responses as to what you feel the purpose of this Quick Vote question is (or any for that matter). - Tito
posted by EDS | 12:13 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home